Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?
-
Correspondence: Kuan-Teh Jeang kjeang@niaid.nih.gov
Retrovirology 2007, 4:42 doi:10.1186/1742-4690-4-42
Accesses
- Last 30 days: 111 accesses
- Last year: 1795 accesses
- All time: 13318 accesses
Cited by
BioMed Central: 5 citations
|
Debate article
The Hirsch index - a play on numbers or a true appraisal of academic output? Taimur Saleem International Archives of Medicine 2011, 4:25 (7 July 2011) |
|
Editorial
The importance of individualized article-specific metrics for evaluating research productivity Kuan-Teh Jeang Retrovirology 2009, 6:82 (16 September 2009) |
|
Editorial
H-index, mentoring-index, highly-cited and highly-accessed: how to evaluate scientists? Kuan-Teh Jeang Retrovirology 2008, 5:106 (25 November 2008) |
|
Commentary
Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index Johannes Hönekopp, Janet Kleber Retrovirology 2008, 5:88 (6 October 2008) |
|
Editorial
Please comment, but with civility Kuan-Teh Jeang Retrovirology 2008, 5:35 (24 April 2008) |