Table 2 |
|||||
|
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and odds ratio for the anti-Env antibody LIPS test in diagnosing HAM/TSP |
|||||
|
Comparisons |
Sensitivity |
Specificity |
PPV |
NPV |
OR (95% CI) |
|
|
|||||
|
> 100,000 LU |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
HAM/TSP vs ATLL & Asymp |
81% |
72% |
75% |
79% |
11.1 (3.7–33.5) |
|
HAM/TSP vs ATLL |
88% |
58% |
75% |
75% |
10.5 (2.8–39.4) |
|
HAM/TSP vs Asymp |
91% |
55% |
75% |
80% |
12.0 (2.8–51.4) |
|
|
|||||
|
> 200,000 LU |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
HAM/TSP vs ATLL & Asymp |
85% |
70% |
70% |
85% |
13.1 (4.1–42.0) |
|
HAM/TSP vs ATLL |
90% |
56% |
70% |
83% |
11.7 (2.8–47.9) |
|
HAM/TSP vs Asymp |
93% |
52% |
70% |
87% |
15.2 (3.0–77.9) |
|
|
|||||
|
Note. PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. |
|||||
|
Burbelo et al. Retrovirology 2008 5:96 doi:10.1186/1742-4690-5-96 |
|||||